Hawk Hps Vs Akebono Ceramic

I switched to ferodo ds2500 and am very very happy.

Hawk hps vs akebono ceramic.

Akebono s are low dust but they really lack bite. They do creak squeak a little bit when braking at. I m hopeing to order some new brakes next week and i m stuck between the hawk hps pads and hawk ceramic pads. Which to me is a small price to pay for excellent braking feel and can be substantially reduced by using a ceramic or other low dust pad.

My akebono ceramics have been nice. Hawk hps vs akebono euro ceramic. I hear the hps are louder and give off a ton more brake dust. My criteria in order of preference are.

Quite happy with hawk hps. I m looking for new brake pads and am debating between hawk hps vs akebono euro ceramic. I kindda narrowed down to two choices and am certainly open to others but i would value all thoughts on the the hawks hps vs the akebono ceramic. They produced a ton of dust on the track but on the street they don t dust much at all.

If hps is cheaper there is no question to get the hps over the ceramics. Low dust i was hoping to get some input from people who have used either pad. They just stop no squeeking no squealing no fading from triple digit slow downs just stop like a pad should. Perform like oem with much less dust and no squealing.

Hawk hps brakes are known to be good for street application and you can take to 1 or 2 track days but definitely not for heavy track use at all. Slightly more dust but well worth it for initial bite and stopping power i am putting hawk hps on my s4 for the best combo of. If you even take it once to a track day you might invest in upgrading to steel braided lines. I hear mixed thoughts about both.

Equal or better stopping power vs oem 2. I had them on my a4. Ceramics are ultra low dust but need to be hot to work well and they don t bite well for my taste. They are only about 6k miles old but dusting is all but nil so far.

Get hawk hps or the akebono.